Building a Strong Data Protection Strategy in Asia: Overcoming Compliance Challenges
Using Data and Analytics To Build a Comprehensive and Proactive Data Protection Compliance Strategy
-
April 07, 2025
-
This FTI Consulting article was written in partnership with Pushkar Dandekar, Director, FTI Consulting; Kenneth Pereire, LL.B. (NUS) (Hons), Managing Director, Advocate and Solicitor (Supreme Court of Singapore), KGP Legal; and Lin Yingxin (Mr.), LL.B. (SMU) (Hons), Associate Director, Head of Corporate Practice, Advocate and Solicitor (Supreme Court of Singapore), KGP Legal.
Financial institutions face growing challenges as data protection regulations evolve and tighten compliance expectations globally, including General Data Protection Regulation (‘GDPR’) in Europe,1 the Personal Information Protection Law (‘PIPL’) in China2 and the Personal Data Protection Act (‘PDPA’) in Singapore.3
The evolution of data protection regulation across Asia represents a transformative challenge for financial institutions operating in the region. While organisations may draw upon existing GDPR compliance frameworks, the distinct requirements of Asian jurisdictions demand specialised approaches that account for regional nuances and regulatory differences. China’s PIPL presents unique challenges, particularly its broad definition of sensitive personal data — including financial account details and its strict consent requirements for cross-border transfers.4 This distinction significantly impacts financial institutions, as nearly all payment transactions fall under sensitive personal information protection requirements, necessitating enhanced security measures and consent protocols.
Table 1: Key Data Protection Frameworks
|
Regulation |
Jurisdiction |
Key Distinctions |
|
PIPL |
China |
|
|
PDPA |
Singapore |
|
|
GDPR |
Europe |
|
The complexity of cross-border data transfers presents particular challenges for financial institutions operating across Asian markets. Unlike GDPR’s establishment-based jurisdictional approach, PIPL focuses specifically on where personal information processing activities occur.5 This fundamental difference requires financial institutions to implement sophisticated tracking systems capable of monitoring data flows in real time, while simultaneously ensuring compliance with multiple regulatory frameworks. Also, the lack of standardised contract templates and unclear accreditation processes for specialised agencies creates operational uncertainty for organisations managing international data transfers.
Increasingly Complex Cross-Border Data Transfers, Third-Party Risk Management and Reporting Obligations
Third-party risk management has emerged as a critical compliance concern in the financial sector. The extensive network of vendors, partners and service providers characteristic of modern financial services creates a complex web of potential vulnerabilities. Institutions must go beyond basic due diligence and implement continuous monitoring of third-party compliance, which requires implementing advanced analytics systems capable of identifying potential risks in real time, while also maintaining detailed documentation of all relationships and data sharing arrangements. The integration of these systems with existing risk management frameworks is crucial for maintaining comprehensive oversight of the extended enterprise ecosystem.
The implementation of effective compliance strategies requires substantial investment in technological infrastructure. Financial institutions must deploy advanced data classification tools that can distinguish between regular and sensitive personal information, automated compliance tracking systems that monitor data flows across borders, and secure data storage solutions that meet multiple regulatory standards. The integration of these systems with existing infrastructure presents significant technical challenges, requiring careful planning and phased implementation to minimise operational disruption. Additionally, organisations must ensure seamless communication between different compliance systems to maintain comprehensive oversight of data protection activities.
Reporting obligations have become increasingly sophisticated, demanding more detailed and frequent submissions to regulatory bodies. Financial institutions must implement automated reporting mechanisms that can generate accurate compliance reports across multiple jurisdictions while still maintaining consistent documentation standards. The integration of these reporting systems with core banking applications ensures timely and accurate submission of required information, reducing the risk of noncompliance and associated penalties. Through these measures, organisations can maintain transparency and accountability while meeting the evolving demands of regulatory oversight.
How Data and Analytics Enhance Compliance
The financial sector operates under strict national and international regulations. Financial institutions have vast amounts of data available across different business units. The use of data analytics enhances efficiency, supports growth and enables informed decision-making. There are numerous opportunities for financial institutions to adopt data analytics capabilities to implement or enhance compliance programmes — particularly across data governance, risk and compliance analytics and forensic analytics.
Enterprise Data Governance and Compliance Analytics
Financial data is highly sensitive, requiring strong governance strategies to protect customers and organisations. Analytics-based data governance coupled with artificial intelligence (‘AI’) and machine learning (‘ML’)-based algorithms can monitor and ensure that data quality is maintained across an organisation. With data analytics and AI, it’s easier to assess and improve key elements of data governance, such as cataloguing, classification, security, lineage, quality and integrity. AI-powered solutions can automatically detect and correct errors such as duplicate or inconsistent values, helping to improve data quality and accuracy, whilst AI-driven anomaly detection monitors data access patterns for potential security breaches.
ML models can classify and categorise sensitive data, both structured and unstructured, ensuring proper handling throughout. ML and AI play a more vital role when it comes to risk analytics and anomaly detection than traditional methods, as traditional methods are primarily rule-based and can invoke many false positives. ML models are trained on the plethora of underlying historical data to understand complex patterns and detect anomalies or irregularities through subtle data pattern deviations. They adapt and evolve with new data, continuously improving accuracy and reducing false positives. This proactive detection helps organisations act early before these anomalies escalate into regulatory breaches, violations and potential legal consequences — making it easier to mitigate risks, enhance data quality and increase data utilisation.
ML plays a crucial role in compliance efforts. Automated compliance systems use ML and natural language processing (‘NLP’) models to monitor regulatory updates in real time, assess their impact on the organisation and ultimately evaluate an institution’s compliance status more efficiently. Advanced analytics can generate detailed compliance reports and facilitate audit and regulatory reviews over and above traditional methods. Adopting these new workstreams ensures transparency with regulators and organisations can proactively identify the areas where they may have violations.
Proactive Risk Mitigation with AI-Driven Solutions
Forensic Analytics
Data protection regulations and frameworks are primarily focused on protecting sensitive data, with forensic analytics playing an important role when it comes to safeguarding this data. ML, AI and NLP-based models can help detect data protection regulation violations, fraud and insider threats earlier. NLP-based techniques such as Named Entity Recognition (‘NER’) can be used for Personally Identifiable Information (‘PII’) detection, and sentiment analysis can be used to flag potential compliance breaches from massive amounts of unstructured data.
Automated risk monitoring, anomaly detection and predictive analytics can enhance compliance while reducing manual effort.
Forensic Analytics in Action
FTI Consulting Provides GDPR Assessment and Action Plan for Global Energy Company
As data protection regulations continue to evolve across Asia, financial institutions must adopt a proactive and comprehensive compliance strategy. The complexity of managing cross-border data transfers, third-party risks and reporting obligations requires a combination of robust governance frameworks and advanced data analytics.
By leveraging AI-driven solutions, forensic analytics and automated compliance tools, financial institutions can enhance data security, streamline regulatory reporting and mitigate risks before they escalate. Implementing real-time monitoring systems and ML models allows organisations to maintain compliance efficiently and effectively, even in an increasingly stringent regulatory landscape.
Looking ahead, financial institutions that prioritise data-driven compliance strategies will not only reduce regulatory risks but also gain a competitive advantage by building trust with customers and regulators alike. With the right technological investments and strategic approaches, organisations can navigate evolving regulations with confidence and resilience.
Footnotes:
1.GDPR.eu, “What is GDPR?,” GDPR.eu (n.d.).
2. China Briefing, “The PRC Personal Information Protection Law (Final) – A Full Translation,” China Briefing, August 24, 2021.
3. Personal Data Protection Commission (PDPC), “Personal Data Protection Act,” Personal Data Protection Commission, (n.d.).
4. China Briefing, “PIPL – Personal Information Protection Law,” China Briefing (Date not specified).
5. Thomas Zhang, “PIPL vs. GDPR: Key Differences and Implications for Compliance in China,” China Briefing, May 18, 2022.
Published
April 07, 2025
Key Contacts